The office score combines the office's own channels with its agent roster. Scores and coverage are based on available public data.

iThink Property - IPSWICH logo
Bronze

iThink Property - IPSWICH

Real Estate AgencyiThink Property

2nd of 2 iThink Property offices by sales

Facebook page shared with 1 other office. Its posts count at 50% toward this office's score.

4.3 · 297 reviews

Google

2/2 graded

Agent roster

65/100

AI visibility · Strong

Bronze
25/100
Agency ScoreScored 21 Oct 2026
BronzeSilver

20 pts to Silver

Is this your agency?Principals only

See your full agency grade. Free.

Verify as the principal of iThink Property - IPSWICH to unlock your full breakdown, next moves and agent roster.

  • Full breakdown across all 7 score dimensions
  • Office next moves with point maths
  • Agent leaderboard inside your office
  • Verified by SMS to your principal mobile
  • Free during beta, takes 2 minutes
Claim this agency

Not the principal? Forward this page to them.
An agent here? Get your own grade →

Market footprint

iThink Property - IPSWICH is a 2-agent iThink Property office in Bundamba, QLD, active across 2 suburbs, with 47 sales by its agents in the last 12 months. This is what sellers find when they compare offices in this area.

Appears for

BundambaPrimary suburbiThink Property2nd of 2 by sales2 agents2 graded47 soldby its agents, 12 months4.3/5 on Google297 reviews

Where the office works

  • Bundamba
    4304
    1 agent
  • Highfields
    4352
    1 agent

Your next moves

· Bundamba offices average 25

#3 of 6 offices in Bundamba

9 points behind #2, 10 points behind #1.

1

Get more of your agents posting

+13 to #1

Roster adoption and quality are 35% of the office score. A team where everyone is switched on beats one or two stars carrying the rest.

Agent roster scoreYou12vsAverage of #1 to #229

Matching them adds about 13 points to your overall score, enough to take #1.

Your competitive position

Rank in

Bundamba

Office area

#3 of 6 scored offices

9 points behind #2, 10 points behind #1.

Offices are ranked against every scored office in the same city, on the office score shown above.

Top 50% in your area#3 of 6
BottomTop
Bronze

25

Office score

On par with area

25

Area avg

PostingNo data
EngagementNo data
Reputation and reviews+13 vs avg
VideoNo data
CreativeNo data
ReachNo data
Agent roster-4 vs avg
Inside iThink Property#2 of 2 in QLD
iThink Property average30/100 -5

Top offices in Bundamba

Office scores combine each office's own channels with its agent roster.

Digital presence breakdown

· Office channels 65%, agent roster 35%
Office channels65%

Posting consistency

Office page posting cadence

No data

Audience engagement

Interaction per follower on office pages

No data

Reputation and reviews

Google and Facebook reviews

62

Video presence

Share of video posts, plus YouTube

No data

Creative quality

Like rate on office posts

No data

Reach and amplification

Organic and paid Facebook reach

No data
Agent roster35%

Agent roster

Adoption and quality of your team

12

Agents at this office· 2

Graded
2 of 2
Posted, 30 days
-
Agent posts, 30 days
-
Agents with a linked profile
Instagram
2
agents
Facebook
1
agents
LinkedIn
2
agents
YouTube
0
agents
TikTok
0
agents

Social proof

Google
4.3/5

297 reviews on Google

Latest: 2 years ago

View reviews
realestate.com.au
47sold

by 2 agents, last 12 months

View office on REA
Facebook
Office page linked

Shared with 1 other office · content counted at 50%

Open page

Facebook ads

No Facebook pages detected for this office

No data

What clients say · Public

iThink Property - IPSWICH has 297 reviews on Google

4.3average rating
See all on Google →
  • a year ago

    Our experience with Ben as property manager has been deeply disappointing and, ultimately, unprofessional. From the outset, communication was unreliable, phone calls were seldom returned, and when responses came, they were often in the form of short text messages that didn’t address the questions we had asked. Instead of being supported and kept informed, we found ourselves constantly chasing information that should have been provided to us as a matter of course. The marketing of our property was equally concerning. The initial advertising did not reflect the value or potential of the land, so we created our own material and requested that it be used. When we first engaged Ben, he assured us the property could achieve a price well above our expectations. Yet within 24 hours of the listing going online, he contacted us suggesting we reduce the asking price by $150,000. That kind of drastic reversal immediately undermined confidence in the accuracy of the original valuation and left us questioning whether any homework had been done at all. Throughout the campaign, the same issues persisted. Offers were occasionally relayed to us, but always well below what we had clearly communicated as acceptable. Even when a genuine offer did come through, it was still too low for us to proceed, and as sellers, we had every right to make that decision. Instead of respecting our position, we then received a passive and dismissive email from Brodi suggesting we had “wasted the buyer’s time.” That is not how professional real estate should operate. Sellers are entitled to accept or decline offers without being made to feel pressured or at fault. Adding to our frustration, we were contacted directly by several prospective buyers who had seen the property through the independent advertisement we had placed on Marketplace. They told us they could not get through to Ben, or that when they did, he was unable to answer basic questions about the land. This not only damaged buyer confidence but likely cost us genuine opportunities. The reality is that we, as the owners, ended up doing much of the marketing and enquiry follow-up ourselves, yet if the property had sold, the agency would still have expected their full commission. That imbalance felt fundamentally unfair. Finally, when we requested a mutual termination agreement, the process was handled with little professionalism. Instead of being provided with a proper termination document, we were told that an email would “serve as evidence.” This kind of approach falls far below industry standards and erodes trust further. In summary, our experience with Ben was defined by inconsistent communication, shifting and unreliable advice, poor handling of buyer enquiries, and a lack of accountability. Real estate is about more than simply closing a deal quickly, it is about diligence, transparency, respect, and genuine client care. Toowoomba deserves real estate professionals who embody those qualities. For fellow landowners, our advice is simple: look elsewhere.

  • a year ago

    Currently renting a property with these guys and going through a break lease due to owner intention to sell, Due to being a single parent with one income and 4 kids I’ve decided to end my lease early as I’m worried in 2 months time I won’t have anywhere to go if an owner occupied buys and with the rental market being the way it is. I expressed this concern and stress to my property manager to only be met with attitude and not one bit of consideration. Not once have I dealt/ had any communication with her throughout my 10 months lease. The lack of communication and response to maintenance reports, general questions or even a call back is ridiculous. It took 3 emails from me, 2 from the receptionist and atleast 3 calls to even get my real estate agent to call me back in regards to my break lease email!!!! And I still haven’t gotten a response in regards to her sending my owner the form and asking what’s needed from me and it’s been 7 days!!!!! Don’t get me wrong Kylie and Paige have been AMAAAAAAZING! But Sandra is definitely rude, inconsiderate of her tenants and needs some training in how to communicate and treat tenants with a little compassion. Honestly can’t wait to say good bye to this realestate the last two weeks since I’ve mentioned I’m leaving have been torture.

  • 2 years ago

    From our first conversation with Jackson regarding our investment properties, we knew we would be in good hands. His exceptional communication, honesty and knowledge of the Ipswich area could not be faulted. Jacksons professionalism throughout our listing process, backed by his down to earth personality, allowed us a very smooth transition over to the iThink property management team. We are extremely grateful for how quickly both Jackson and the team at iThink worked to find desirable tenants for our property, removing any stress from the process. We highly recommend that you give him a call!!

    Lisa HallGoogle

Recent posts

· Office pages, last 30 days
Office posts
0
Instagram
0
Facebook
0
YouTube
0

This Facebook page is shared across 2 offices. Content on a shared page counts at 50% toward each office's score.

Also used by iThink Property Toowoomba. An office-level page restores full credit.

No posts collected yet

We've found the office pages but haven't scanned their posts yet. Check back in 24 hours.

AI Search Visibility

65/100Strong

Likely to surface when buyers ask AI assistants about offices in the area.

LowHigh
Review Authority
Strong
34/ 40

Google: 297 reviews · 4.3★ · REA: 68 reviews · 4.9★

Strong review authority across plenty of credible sources for AI to cite.

Social Presence
Strong
25/ 25

IG 1,342 followers · FB 4,700 followers

Strong multi-platform presence (6,042 followers). Wide enough to surface in AI search.

Content Consistency
Weak
0/ 20

Office activity score: 0/100

No recent posts. Start posting consistently so AI has fresh material to index.

Paid Amplification
Growing
6/ 15

Facebook pages linked · No active ads

Even $5/day on your top posts dramatically expands AI's reach.

Recent sales activity

· Public data
Sales in last 12 months47 sold by its agents
Current listingsNot fetched yet
Primary suburbBundamba

Profile completeness

90%
  • Agency logo
  • Brand colour
  • Phone number
  • Website
  • Company LinkedIn page
  • Company Facebook page
  • Company Instagram
  • Google reviews connected
  • Facebook ads running
  • At least 2 agents graded

Office data sourced from public real estate listings and the office's own social pages. Scores calculated from publicly available activity.

Powered by