The office score combines the office's own channels with its agent roster. Scores and coverage are based on available public data.

Connect Australia Realty logo
Gold

Connect Australia Realty

Real Estate AgencyIndependent office

4.2 · 15 reviews

Google

1/1 graded

Agent roster

43/100

AI visibility · Building

Gold
61/100
Agency ScoreScored 15 Oct 2026
GoldPlatinum

19 pts to Platinum

Is this your agency?Principals only

See your full agency grade. Free.

Verify as the principal of Connect Australia Realty to unlock your full breakdown, next moves and agent roster.

  • Full breakdown across all 7 score dimensions
  • Office next moves with point maths
  • Agent leaderboard inside your office
  • Verified by SMS to your principal mobile
  • Free during beta, takes 2 minutes
Claim this agency

Not the principal? Forward this page to them.
An agent here? Get your own grade →

Market footprint

Connect Australia Realty is a 1-agent independent office in Gwynneville, NSW, active across 1 suburb, with 1 sale by its agents in the last 12 months. This is what sellers find when they compare offices in this area.

Appears for

GwynnevillePrimary suburbIndependentSingle office1 agent1 graded1 soldby its agents, 12 months4.2/5 on Google15 reviews

Where the office works

  • Gwynneville
    2500
    1 agent

Your next moves

· Gwynneville offices average 61

#1 of 1 office in Gwynneville

The only scored office here so far.

Your office is scoring well across all dimensions. Keep up the consistency.

Your competitive position

Rank in

Gwynneville

Office area

#1 of 1 scored office

The only scored office here so far.

Offices are ranked against every scored office in the same city, on the office score shown above.

Gold

61

Office score

On par with area

61

Area avg

PostingNo data
EngagementNo data
Reputation and reviews19
VideoNo data
CreativeNo data
ReachNo data
Agent roster76

Digital presence breakdown

· Office channels 65%, agent roster 35%
Office channels65%

Posting consistency

Office page posting cadence

No data

Audience engagement

Interaction per follower on office pages

No data

Reputation and reviews

Google and Facebook reviews

19

Video presence

Share of video posts, plus YouTube

No data

Creative quality

Like rate on office posts

No data

Reach and amplification

Organic and paid Facebook reach

No data
Agent roster35%

Agent roster

Adoption and quality of your team

76

Agents at this office· 1

Graded
1 of 1
Posted, 30 days
-
Agent posts, 30 days
-
Agents with a linked profile
Instagram
1
agents
Facebook
1
agents
LinkedIn
0
agents
YouTube
0
agents
TikTok
0
agents

Social proof

Google
4.2/5

15 reviews on Google

Latest: 2 months ago

View reviews
realestate.com.au
1sold

by 1 agent, last 12 months

View office on REA
Facebook
Office page linked

Agents tracked separately

Open page

Facebook ads

No Facebook pages detected for this office

No data

What clients say · Public

Connect Australia Realty has 15 reviews on Google

4.2average rating
See all on Google →
  • 2 months ago

    Be warned. Based on my experience, I would have serious concerns about whether this agent acts in the best interests of the landlord. Dimas acted as my managing agent. When the tenant advised that they wished to vacate the property due to alleged mould, Dimas did not advise me that I may have been entitled to a break fee. I subsequently discovered that he had assisted the same tenant in leasing another property. In my view, this created a serious conflict of interest and raises significant concerns as to why my entitlement to a break fee was never brought to my attention. Because Dimas was acting as my appointed managing agent, I was ultimately bound by the representations and actions he made on my behalf. As a consequence, I was unable to recover the break fee from the tenant. There were further concerns regarding the handling of the end of the tenancy. Before I became aware of the apparent conflict of interest, Dimas discouraged me from pursuing deductions from the tenant’s bond for damage to the property. Dimas also failed to conduct an outgoing condition inspection promptly after the tenant vacated. I had to repeatedly press him to carry out the inspection, and it was eventually conducted 10 days after the tenant had vacated. This delay was particularly concerning given the importance of documenting the condition of the property at the end of a tenancy and assessing any potential bond claims. Furthermore, after the tenant had already vacated, a building inspection indicated that the mould was not caused by water ingress or leaks as the tenant had alleged. The matter subsequently proceeded to the Tribunal. During conciliation, I raised the circumstances surrounding the break fee and the managing agent’s handling of the tenancy. The Tribunal Member advised me to raise the conduct of the managing agent with NSW Fair Trading. I am extremely disappointed with the way this tenancy was managed. In particular, I am concerned that my rights and financial interests as the landlord were not properly explained or protected, while the departing tenant was assisted in securing alternative accommodation. Taken together, the failure to advise me about the break fee, the apparent conflict of interest, the discouragement from pursuing the bond, and the delayed outgoing inspection have left me with serious concerns about how my interests as the landlord were represented.

    Erin LeeGoogle
  • 2 years ago

    We were renting from Dimas for a 2 bedder in Wolli Creek. During the tenancy, everything was very good and swiftly replied to. Granted, the property did not need any big repairs. For context, the carpet had a couple of discoloration spots all around when we first moved in and was even noted in the incoming inspection. However at the end of the tenancy, it's where things started to get messy. Shame because we always pay 4 weeks in advance rent and are good tenants but this is what we are rewarded with. They withheld my bond due to new carpet stains and wanted $330 to fix the carpet and they escalated it all the way up to NCAT. I did have photos and evidence to prove that the discoloration spots have occurred before we moved in to avoid going to NCAT. Thus, I am very surprised that the landlord is willing to pay for the NCAT application fee + the time of Dimas to prepare for the hearing for a measly sum of $330. Anyway, NCAT threw out the decision less than 10 mins citing that those orange spots had already occurred and it's strange for a carpet to develop orange spots. The common denominator may not be the tenant's fault but rather, the quality of the carpet itself. Besides, the carpet is already fully depreciated to the ATO's schedule so I don't see what are you actually claiming against. In conclusion, the real losers out of this situation is the landlord and the tenant. The landlord wasted so much money and as for me, it wasted my time and opportunity cost to re-invest that bond money held.

  • 3 years ago

    We purchased our apartment through Dimas and Connect Realty and had his team manage the property for just over a year. We then moved into the propert and Dimas was extremely helpful with the changeover and attention to detail when performing the outgoing inspection. Would highly recommend Dimas and his team.

    Luke DoffGoogle

Recent posts

· Office pages, last 30 days
Office posts
0
Instagram
0
Facebook
0
YouTube
0

No posts collected yet

We've found the office pages but haven't scanned their posts yet. Check back in 24 hours.

AI Search Visibility

43/100Building

Strengthen content consistency and paid amplification across the office to boost AI recommendations.

LowHigh
Review Authority
Growing
19/ 40

Google: 15 reviews · 4.2★ · REA: 8 reviews · 5.0★

Good foundation. Growing Google reviews will have the biggest impact.

Social Presence
Strong
18/ 25

IG present · FB present

Great start with 0 combined followers. Push past 500 to strengthen credibility.

Content Consistency
Weak
0/ 20

Office activity score: 0/100

No recent posts. Start posting consistently so AI has fresh material to index.

Paid Amplification
Growing
6/ 15

Facebook pages linked · No active ads

Even $5/day on your top posts dramatically expands AI's reach.

Recent sales activity

· Public data
Sales in last 12 months1 sold by its agents
Current listingsNot fetched yet
Primary suburbGwynneville

Profile completeness

80%
  • Agency logo
  • Brand colour
  • Phone number
  • Website
  • Company LinkedIn page
  • Company Facebook page
  • Company Instagram
  • Google reviews connected
  • Facebook ads running
  • At least 2 agents graded

Office data sourced from public real estate listings and the office's own social pages. Scores calculated from publicly available activity.

Powered by